Thereâs an old saying: âA fish rots from the head first.â Itâs not just a salty idiomâitâs a profound truth for anyone entrusted with leadership oversight.
Whether you're sitting on a board, serving as an elder, chairing a committee, or simply voting at the ballot box, hereâs the hard, holy truth: everything rises and falls on leadership. Culture, strategy, and tactics are all downstream of the person at the top. If something stinks, check the head.
đ A Fish Rots from the Head: What It Really Means
The phrase âA fish rots from the head downâ is a blunt and timeless proverb that reminds us of a critical leadership truth: when an organization is in decline, the problem usually starts at the topânot with the staff, not with the systems, not with external conditions. The rot begins at the head.
The expression is often attributed to a Turkish proverbââBalık baĆtan kokarââmeaning âa fish smells from the head first.â It dates back centuries and shows up in various cultures, from ancient China to Greece. No matter the origin, the sentiment remains universally understood: leaders are responsible for the healthâor decayâof the organizations they lead.
This isnât just about moral corruption (though thatâs certainly part of it). Itâs about patterns of poor decision-making, toxic culture creation, unethical behavior, vision drift, or emotional immaturity. Itâs about leaders who dominate instead of develop, hide instead of communicate, and react instead of respond.
If a culture smells off, check the tone at the top. If trust is eroding, ask whoâs stirring the waters. If decisions feel murky, look to the headânot the tail. If you're seeing repeated turnover, mission confusion, financial irregularities, or follower fatigueâdonât just manage the symptoms.
Check the head.
Boards and trustees, this phrase is more than colorful language. Itâs your lens for accountability. It calls us to discern not just what is happening, but *who* is causing itâand why the same problems persist despite surface-level change. It challenges us to ask, âIs the leader setting the tone for lifeâor for rot?â
·      Culture rot? Check the CEO.
·      Church decline? Check the pastor.
·      Campus chaos? Check the president.
·      Organizational malaise? Check the leader.
·      Family dysfunction? Check the parents.
This isnât scapegoating. Itâs source-seeking. Because if the head is sick, the body canât heal.
Stop Blaming the Wind
Several years ago, I sat in a board meeting discussing ongoing institutional issues. As expected, the usual list of external scapegoats made their appearance: COVID, the economy, funding challenges, shifting demographicsâyou name it. These factors may be real, but they are not revelatory.
I calmly said, âThe problems we are experiencing are leadership-related. Full stop.â
External conditions will always exist. We canât control the weather, but we can evaluate how our captain is steering the ship. And if that captain is blaming the waves instead of owning the rudder, weâve got a bigger storm on our hands.
The Culture Is a Mirror
Peter Drucker famously said, âCulture eats strategy for breakfast.â True. But leadership is the chef. If your leader's team is demoralized, toxic, apathetic, or disengagedâand theyâve been that way for more than a fiscal quarterâlook up, not down.
As goes the leader, so goes the team. Always.
A leaderâs attitude will infect or invigorate the ranks. Their ethics become the organizationâs baseline. Their humility, or lack thereof, becomes the organizational posture. They model what ârightâ looks likeâor they model something else.
Leaders donât just set the tone. They are the tone.
Liquid Leadership
Think of an organization like a liquid: it takes the shape of its container. And that container is the leader. Their beliefs, emotional intelligence, vision, and follow-through all determine the shape and flow of the culture.
If the culture is fearful, sloppy, combative, or confused, that form didnât appear by accident. It was poured that way. Leadership precedes culture. Always. So, letâs stop acting shocked when we see recurring issues and start tracing them to their source.
What Now?
If you're on a board, committee, family unit, or team responsible for evaluating a leader, here's your litmus test:
·      Is the team healthy? If not, ask whyâand more importantly, ask who. Who is creating the roadblocks, obfuscating communication, or stalling decisions? Toxic cultures often trace directly to enabling or controlling leaders.
·      Are we hearing more excuses than execution? Who is framing the narrative?
·      Are we using tools like 360-degree feedback, external evaluations, and formal reviews to assess leadership honestly?
·      Is the culture reflecting the character we expect from the leader?
·      Do followers feel safe to follow? Or are they stuck in survival mode, burned out, or walking on eggshells?
·      Are we seeing senior members resign unexpectedly? If so, we must ask why. When a seasoned team member exits without clear succession or visible preparation, it often signals alienation. They may smile at the exit interview, but rest assuredâthey're not just leaving the job. They're quitting their leader. Senior transitions should never come as a surprise.
Just as important as respecting the chain of command is ensuring the transparent flow of truth. Itâs a delicate balanceâbut a humble leader will honor open channels of communication between evaluators and their team members. When truth is welcome, transformation is possible.
Letâs bring it full circle: if it smells fishy, somethingâs amissy. Leadership isnât about appearing clean on the surface while decay festers underneath. We all hold a sacred duty to evaluate our leaders, and we must be willing to look beneath the waterline. Because when leadership rots, the whole organization is at risk of going belly-up.